{"id":798,"date":"2013-10-22T21:00:20","date_gmt":"2013-10-23T02:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.robertfeder.com\/?p=798"},"modified":"2013-11-08T19:46:12","modified_gmt":"2013-11-09T01:46:12","slug":"the-second-coming-of-jon-kelley","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/robertfeder.dailyherald.com\/2013\/10\/22\/the-second-coming-of-jon-kelley\/","title":{"rendered":"The second coming of Jon Kelley?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Jon<\/a>

<\/a> Jon Kelley<\/p><\/div>\n

online glasses<\/a><\/div>\n

The first time Jon Kelley came to Chicago, he was a 25-year-old rookie sportscaster at NBC-owned WMAQ-Channel 5 who became known more for his handsome face and Armani wardrobe than for his reporting or anchoring skills.<\/p>\n

Now, more than two decades later, it looks like he may be returning to host \"Good Day Chicago\" on WFLD-Channel 32. Nothing's confirmed, but Kelley's recent visit to the Fox-owned station has insiders convinced he's close to a deal.<\/p>\n

How his hiring would affect the show's four current anchors \u2014 Anna Davlantes, Corey McPherrin, Dawn Hasbrouck and newcomer Natalie Bomke<\/a> \u2014 is unknown. But considering the rock-bottom ratings they're getting from 4:30 to 10 a.m. five days a week, there's certainly nothing to lose by shaking things up.<\/p>\n

Kelley, 48, most recently has been morning co-anchor at KNTV-TV, the NBC station in San Francisco. He previously was weekend anchor and correspondent for the syndicated show-biz magazine \"Extra\" and an anchor for Fox Sports Network.<\/p>\n

A star running back for the University of Nebraska in his hometown of Lincoln, Kelley held on-air jobs in Omaha, Sioux City, Iowa, and Kansas City, Missouri, before Chicago beckoned in 1991 with weekend sports anchor offers from both NBC 5 and CBS-owned WBBM-Channel 2.\u00a0 He accepted the former. When Mark Giangreco jumped to ABC-owned WLS-Channel 7 in 1995, Kelley moved up to the top sports job at NBC 5. Over the years, his on-air performance improved, but he never overcame the harsh, early assessment of critics:<\/p>\n